Umbra Wiki attack-pattern attack-pattern/CAPEC-674
Back to wiki

CAPEC-674 — Design for FPGA Maliciously Altered

provenance: imported · ATT&CK: T1195.003

CAPEC-674: Design for FPGA Maliciously Altered

MITRE CAPEC attack pattern

Status Stable
Typical severity High
Likelihood of attack Low
Catalogue CAPEC 3.9 (2023-01-24)

Description

An adversary alters the functionality of a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) by causing an FPGA configuration memory chip reload in order to introduce a malicious function that could result in the FPGA performing or enabling malicious functions on a host system. Prior to the memory chip reload, the adversary alters the program for the FPGA by adding a function to impact system operation.

Where this sits in the chain

A finding maps to a weakness (CWE), a weakness is exploited by an attack pattern (CAPEC), and an attack pattern shows up in ATT&CK as observed adversary behaviour. This page is the middle hop.

ATT&CK techniques: T1195.003

Prerequisites

  • An adversary would need to have access to FPGA programming/configuration-related systems in a chip maker’s development environment where FPGAs can be initially configured prior to delivery to a customer or have access to such systems in a customer facility where end-user FPGA configuration/reconfiguration can be performed.

Skills required

  • High: An adversary would need to be skilled in FPGA programming in order to create/manipulate configurations in such a way that when loaded into an FPGA, the end user would be able to observe through testing all user-defined required functions but would be unaware of any additional functions the adversary may have introduced.

Consequences

  • Integrity: Alter Execution Logic

Mitigations

  • Utilize DMEA’s (Defense Microelectronics Activity) Trusted Foundry Program members for acquisition of microelectronic components.
  • Ensure that each supplier performing hardware development implements comprehensive, security-focused configuration management including for FPGA programming and program uploads to FPGA chips.
  • Require that provenance of COTS microelectronic components be known whenever procured.
  • Conduct detailed vendor assessment before acquiring COTS hardware.

Source