Umbra Wiki attack-pattern attack-pattern/CAPEC-8
Back to wiki

CAPEC-8 — Buffer Overflow in an API Call

provenance: imported · CWE: CWE-20 CWE-74 CWE-118 CWE-119 CWE-120 CWE-680 CWE-697 CWE-733

CAPEC-8: Buffer Overflow in an API Call

MITRE CAPEC attack pattern

Status Draft
Typical severity High
Likelihood of attack High
Catalogue CAPEC 3.9 (2023-01-24)

Description

This attack targets libraries or shared code modules which are vulnerable to buffer overflow attacks. An adversary who has knowledge of known vulnerable libraries or shared code can easily target software that makes use of these libraries. All clients that make use of the code library thus become vulnerable by association. This has a very broad effect on security across a system, usually affecting more than one software process.

Where this sits in the chain

A finding maps to a weakness (CWE), a weakness is exploited by an attack pattern (CAPEC), and an attack pattern shows up in ATT&CK as observed adversary behaviour. This page is the middle hop.

Weaknesses exploited: CWE-20, CWE-74, CWE-118, CWE-119, CWE-120, CWE-680, CWE-697, CWE-733

Prerequisites

  • The target host exposes an API to the user.
  • One or more API functions exposed by the target host has a buffer overflow vulnerability.

Skills required

  • Low: An adversary can simply overflow a buffer by inserting a long string into an adversary-modifiable injection vector. The result can be a DoS.
  • High: Exploiting a buffer overflow to inject malicious code into the stack of a software system or even the heap can require a higher skill level.

Consequences

  • Availability: Unreliable Execution
  • Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability: Execute Unauthorized Commands
  • Confidentiality: Read Data
  • Integrity: Modify Data

Mitigations

  • Use a language or compiler that performs automatic bounds checking.
  • Use secure functions not vulnerable to buffer overflow.
  • If you have to use dangerous functions, make sure that you do boundary checking.
  • Compiler-based canary mechanisms such as StackGuard, ProPolice and the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag. Unless this provides automatic bounds checking, it is not a complete solution.
  • Use OS-level preventative functionality. Not a complete solution.

Source